Mapping collaboration. Enabling innovation. Shaping Australia's future.
Australia's open innovation intelligence platform, combining ecosystem mapping, evidence-based research and curated learning tools to help organisations collaborate, experiment and grow with purpose.
A data-driven view of Australia's open innovation landscape — composition, geography and sector coverage
Open innovation is a paradigm that assumes firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas — and both internal and external paths to market — as they look to advance their technology and grow.
Beyond the classic outside-in and inside-out framework, research has extended open innovation to include three additional modes — recognising the full spectrum of how organisations can orchestrate knowledge flows. See: Extending Open Innovation: How to Orchestrate Your Knowledge Flows, California Management Review (2023) ↗
Curated resources — grounded in research and practice — to help founders, innovators and corporate teams learn, upskill and navigate the open innovation landscape.
Open innovation does not happen in a vacuum. Understanding the sustainability imperative and the ability to navigate uncertainty are increasingly central to how organisations design and lead their innovation strategies.
Sustainability is no longer a side agenda in corporate innovation — it is becoming the primary driver. Open innovation is uniquely suited to addressing complex sustainability challenges that no single organisation can solve alone, enabling the cross-sector collaboration, shared IP and co-investment models that systemic change requires.
Effective open innovation strategy requires the ability to act under uncertainty — to sense weak signals, anticipate disruption and design for multiple futures. Strategic foresight provides the methods to do this systematically, moving from reactive to anticipatory innovation management.
Research-grounded conceptual models that help visualise how open innovation works — from the foundational Chesbrough funnel to the full 5-mode knowledge flow framework and the OI maturity progression.
Open innovation is no longer just a theory — it is a strategic imperative for large organisations. Many companies worldwide now establish dedicated open innovation roles: a LinkedIn search reveals over 110,000 people with "open innovation" in their title or job description — from entry-level innovation analysts to Head of Open Innovation. Understanding the full range of practices and the new organisational forms that enable them is critical to building a sustainable corporate innovation capability.
Large firms face two main challenges in open innovation: managing organisational change internally and managing external relationships with innovation sources. The traditional outside-in / inside-out framework doesn't fully capture the reality of how the most innovative corporate units operate. Research by Gutmann, Chochoiek & Chesbrough (CMR, 2023) extends the framework to include inside-in and outside-out knowledge flows — revealing how leading firms orchestrate innovation across internal silos as well as broader ecosystems.
Based on Gutmann, Chochoiek & Chesbrough (2023) and extended with broader corporate innovation literature. Examples drawn from leading global corporations.
| Knowledge flow | Role of OI unit | Practice | What it means | Corporate examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Outside → In
External knowledge brought inside
|
Market Accelerator & Gap Closer | Startup investment & scouting | CVC invests in startups to accelerate market development and bring innovations inside corporate boundaries | Intel Capital, Salesforce Ventures, Telstra Ventures (AU) |
| Corporate accelerators | Running structured cohort programs where external startups develop solutions to corporate challenges | Startupbootcamp, muru-D (Telstra), EnergyLab (AU) | ||
| University & research partnerships | Licensing IP, co-funding research, embedding researchers to access academic knowledge | CSIRO partnerships, UNSW Innovations (AU) | ||
| Open challenges & hackathons | Crowdsourcing solutions from external innovators through time-limited competitions with defined problem statements | NASA Space Apps, IBM Call for Code, ANZ hackathons (AU) | ||
| M&A as innovation channel | Acquiring innovative companies to internalise capabilities rather than build them from scratch | Google acquiring DeepMind; Atlassian's acquisition strategy | ||
|
Inside → Out
Internal knowledge flows outward
|
Intrapreneurship Enabler | Corporate spinouts | Validating and spinning off internal innovations as independent ventures when they don't fit core business | Paypal (spun from eBay); Airtasker (Heritage of Telstra spinout culture) |
| IP licensing | Monetising unused patents and technology by licensing to external parties, creating revenue without direct commercialisation | Qualcomm licensing model; CSIRO's WiFi patent (AU) | ||
| Intrapreneurship programs | Structured internal programs allowing employees to develop and commercialise ideas, with CVC mentorship and access to capital | Google's 20% time; Atlassian ShipIt; ANZ Ventures labs | ||
| Corporate venture building | Building new ventures internally using corporate resources, talent and distribution — distinct from investing in external startups | Collective Campus (AU), BlueChilli (AU), BCG Digital Ventures | ||
|
Outside → Out
Connecting external actors to each other
|
Ecosystem Enricher & Shaper | Ecosystem curation & platform building | Creating exclusive workshops, events or digital platforms that match startups with customers, partners and co-investors — without internalising the knowledge | SAP.io, BASF Venture Capital, Hitachi Ventures; Stone & Chalk (AU) |
| Promoting market ecosystems | Orchestrating working groups or industry coalitions to build shared infrastructure for emerging markets — accelerating a space the corporation will benefit from | Hyundai Cradle / H2 Mobility hydrogen ecosystem; Tech Central Sydney (AU) | ||
| Pre-due-diligence validation | Leveraging corporate customer relationships to run proof-of-concepts between startups and clients before formal investment — saving time and reducing risk | Various CVCs using mothership client networks to validate portfolio startups | ||
| Deal flow sharing | Sharing promising ventures with other CVC or VC units in a pay-it-forward principle — building reciprocal access to deal flow across the investment community | Intel Capital; Firemark Ventures co-investments (AU) | ||
|
Inside → In
Connecting knowledge across internal silos
|
Cross-Silo Knowledge Broker | Venture-informed decision-making | OI/CVC units curate and share external venture intelligence to guide corporate executives' strategic decisions — turning portfolio insights into internal strategic value | BASF Venture Capital sharing insights at executive strategy meetings; NAB Ventures (AU) |
| Internal knowledge brokering | OI units actively connect business units and R&D teams that hold complementary knowledge but don't naturally interact — reducing internal silos | Telstra Ventures connecting IoT insights to product teams; Philips Innovation Services | ||
| Innovation scouting networks | Deploying internal scouts across geographies and business units to identify and share emerging trends, technologies and opportunities before they reach the core R&D team | Siemens Technology-to-Business; CSIRO ON Prime network (AU) | ||
| Corporate clienting | The corporate acts as an anchor customer for its own portfolio startups — providing revenue, validation and a reference case that unlocks further growth. A strategic form of inside-in where the mothership's procurement feeds internal OI units' investees | Westpac adopting Davidson Institute-supported fintechs; various corporate accelerator demo day procurement commitments |
As open innovation matures, corporations are experimenting with increasingly sophisticated organisational structures to manage it. Understanding the distinctions between these models is essential for choosing the right fit.
Dąbrowska, Keränen & Mention (2024) empirically unpacked how dedicated open innovation functions operate in practice — beyond the buzzwords. Their research identified four distinct practice domains that OI units engage in, structured along two dimensions: whether the focus is on structures or actors, and whether the stakeholders are internal or external. The study reveals that effective OI functions must actively manage all four domains simultaneously.
| Dimension | Venture Clienting | Corporate VC |
|---|---|---|
| Entry mechanism | Purchase order / procurement contract | Equity investment (term sheet) |
| Capital required | Operational / procurement budget | Dedicated investment fund ($50M–$500M+) |
| Equity taken | None | 5–25% typically |
| Time to start | Weeks (fast pilot setup) | Months (due diligence, legal, board approval) |
| Startup maturity needed | Working product / proven solution | Promising idea to proven product |
| Risk profile | Low — pay for delivered value | High — bet on future potential |
| Who can run it | Any business unit with a budget | Specialist CVC team with investment expertise |
| Best for | Technology access, fast pilots, operations improvement | Strategic positioning, market shaping, financial return |
| OI knowledge flow | Outside-In (primary) · Inside-In | All four flows when done well |
| Pioneer example | BMW Group Startup Garage (2015) | Intel Capital (1991) |
| Dimension | Venture Builder | Venture Studio | Corporate Accelerator | Corporate CVC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Idea / problem | Systematic thesis | External startup applies | External startup pitches |
| Equity held | 30–60% | 20–40% (shared model) | 0–10% | 5–25% |
| Capital provided | Seed (with resources) | Pre-seed + shared ops | Small grant / stipend | Seed to Series B+ |
| Resources provided | Full team, legal, tech | Shared team across portfolio | Mentors, workspace, network | Capital + strategic access |
| Duration of involvement | Long-term (3–7 yrs) | Long-term, parallel | Short (3–6 months) | Long-term (board seat) |
| OI knowledge flow | Inside-Out / Outside-In | Inside-Out | Outside-In | All four flows |
| Best for | Corporates with internal ideas + non-technical founders | Systematic new-venture creation at scale | Ecosystem engagement + pipeline building | Strategic technology access + financial return |
This landmark case study examines how Swarovski — a 125-year-old family-owned luxury brand — transformed its innovation model from closed to open. Despite being a heritage incumbent with deeply embedded traditions, the company built a dedicated open innovation function from scratch, overcoming powerful internal resistance to become an active ecosystem participant.
Building Australia's integrated Open Innovation Map — making collaboration pathways visible, accessible, and actionable.
Open Innovation Navigator Australia is a research and innovation engagement initiative, created to support organisations navigating an increasingly complex innovation ecosystem. Led by Dr Justyna Dabrowska, RMIT University, it has received Platform Activity Fund from RMIT Global Business Innovation Enabling Capability Platform.
The initiative aims to build Australia's integrated Open Innovation Map to make collaboration pathways visible, accessible, and actionable. The goal is to turn complexity into clarity and help organisations unlock new opportunities for innovation. As Open Innovation becomes increasingly central to how organisations stimulate, accelerate, and streamline innovation, our platform provides guidance grounded in research, practice, and real ecosystem insights.
We are building Australia's integrated Open Innovation Map, designed to visualise the actors, relationships, and collaboration mechanisms shaping innovation across the country. By combining ecosystem mapping, evidence-based insights, AI-enabled tools, and interactive learning resources, we aim to make open innovation visible, accessible, and actionable for every organisation.
We welcome enquiries about research collaboration and industry partnerships in the following areas.
If you are interested to learn more about the initiative and how to get involved — whether as a listed organisation, research collaborator, or ecosystem partner — we'd love to hear from you.
Discover where your organisation sits on the open innovation journey. Get a personalised profile, priority actions and recommended resources.
Grounded in research by Dąbrowska, Keränen & Mention (CMR, 2024), Gutmann, Chochoiek & Chesbrough (CMR, 2023), Enkel, Bell & Hogenkamp (2011) and Sopra Steria OI Report (2023).
Aggregated, anonymised results from completed assessments.